I was sitting here thinking about all of the smaller sauce companies that bit the dust. Ones that I miss. Great f****** sauces that just didn't make it. The passion sauces. The companies that started up because friends told them "this shit is gold!" So they started small with little knowledge and sold a few hundred bottles and eventually disappeared. I was thinking of how to co-op a brand. So basically there is ONE brand that serves as an umbrella. It has a name. The sauce company that closed up, this would be the brand under the brand and there would be many. One sauce I remember was Feisty Parrot. Great sauces! They were active here and used the forum for a lot of suggestions. We watched them rise and fall. But let's get back to the co-oping.
Okay so McCormick own Frank's Hot Sauce. Frank's Hot Sauce has multiple flavors. In this scenario, Feisty Parrot would have been Frank's, not McCormick. McCormick is the co-op. But they do not own the companies under them they serve as a co-op only.
So let's give it a name. Fire Frenzy.
So Fire Frenzy would be funded by a pool. A pool of saucemakers that own brands. FF handles marketing, etc. Feisty Parrot would be of the many brands. Independently owned but part of a co-op model business under Fire Frenzy.
Would this "all-in" model with pooled resources help the small survive? Would they be able to hit hard as a unified effort acting as a parent brand (Fire Frenzy)? Should there be a max of allowed brands to avoid diminished returns?
I have more to say but I am going to hit Post now and continue later. And maybe salsalady can chime in on her thoughts on this model.
Okay so McCormick own Frank's Hot Sauce. Frank's Hot Sauce has multiple flavors. In this scenario, Feisty Parrot would have been Frank's, not McCormick. McCormick is the co-op. But they do not own the companies under them they serve as a co-op only.
So let's give it a name. Fire Frenzy.
So Fire Frenzy would be funded by a pool. A pool of saucemakers that own brands. FF handles marketing, etc. Feisty Parrot would be of the many brands. Independently owned but part of a co-op model business under Fire Frenzy.
Would this "all-in" model with pooled resources help the small survive? Would they be able to hit hard as a unified effort acting as a parent brand (Fire Frenzy)? Should there be a max of allowed brands to avoid diminished returns?
I have more to say but I am going to hit Post now and continue later. And maybe salsalady can chime in on her thoughts on this model.