But with a different slant. This is not about what type of light is best - it is really a different type.
I'm fixating on researching growing tomatoes in a Greenhouse, especially in northern areas and ran across an interesting study. It says, in part:
"Using supplemental HPS lighting (100 micromoles/M2S1 for 18 hours/day) a salable yield of 9.3 kg/M2 was produced during the midwinter cropping period 28 December to 18 January 1984. The unlit control crop produced 3.9 kg/M2 salable fruit during this period of low natural radiation."
If my conversions are correct, 100 micromoles/M2S1 of HPS light equals ~8200 lux. This light provides 15,000 lux and covers about 30 inches, so I should be able to get away with using three of them to cover 15 linear feet.
Keep in mind, this is supplemental light, not the sole light source.
Mike
I'm fixating on researching growing tomatoes in a Greenhouse, especially in northern areas and ran across an interesting study. It says, in part:
"Using supplemental HPS lighting (100 micromoles/M2S1 for 18 hours/day) a salable yield of 9.3 kg/M2 was produced during the midwinter cropping period 28 December to 18 January 1984. The unlit control crop produced 3.9 kg/M2 salable fruit during this period of low natural radiation."
If my conversions are correct, 100 micromoles/M2S1 of HPS light equals ~8200 lux. This light provides 15,000 lux and covers about 30 inches, so I should be able to get away with using three of them to cover 15 linear feet.
Keep in mind, this is supplemental light, not the sole light source.
Mike