The logic goes like this: people will want the world's hottest pepper, therefore, whatever is declared the world's hottest will immediately have appeal. I suggest that this is false, based on, amongst other things, the economic "law" of diminishing returns (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminishing_returns).%C2 The difference between the Red Savina and the Bhut Jolokia resulted in a lot of hype around the Bhut, people liked it, it was great, new and exotic. Now the difference between the Bhut and the rest? Well, I argue it's not that great. You can never recreate the excitement the Bhut generated, that happened once, and only once. Peppers may be hotter, but they will never have the mystique of the Bhut.
Two points on why you should not talk about a single "world's hottest" anymore:
Two points on why you should not talk about a single "world's hottest" anymore:
- Experienced growers don't fall for this kind of marketing. In fact, it may actually work against you, since you may appear more interested in hype than substance, especially if you are charging more money for the "world's hottest" when it's the same cost to produce as other very similar peppers.
- Less knowledgeable hobby growers have experienced "world's hottest" fatigue. Many average people still think the "ghost pepper" is the world's hottest. Try explaining that it no longer is and they lose interest. For example, what kind of hobby grower (growing a Douglah, Butch T, or whatever) who wants to show off that he's growing the world's hottest would ever be reproached by his even-less-knowledgeable friends and family about it? On average, if I tell someone "I'm growing the world's hottest", the response is "wow" and then a yawn, but definitely not a nerdy pepper discussion.