Actually, no. I noticed it was mentioned but I didn't see a link. I would love to read it.
I'm not out to disprove the volume of evidence that says 6500K lights are great for vegetative growth, they apparently are. But what I am saying is that the 2700K are equally or perhaps more efficient. This is based on my own findings, not Google searches. I have had plants under the 6500K lights for weeks only to see them languish. But if I stick them under a 20 watt, 2700K light (four plants in a nine-ounce cup at a time), they add inches of stems and leaves in just a few days.
Should I ignore my findings and accept the widely-held views that one needs to use 6500K lights?
Mike