• This is the place to discuss all spicy commerical products, not just sauce!

review Mad Dog Reaper Sriracha

Copied from my new blog attempt:
 
Hello again spice lovers and happy tuesday.
This week I bring you a type of sauce from Thailand that’s skyrocketed in popularity over the last few years. Yes, you know it, I’m reviewing a sriracha. But not just any sriracha, this one’s a little different.
 
Before I get to reviewing this sauce, however, I have to apologise. You won’t be seeing the packaging in pristine condition. I got this sauce from a friend who didn’t want it so it was already opened before I could take pictures. Don’t worry though, everything but the heat shrink top is in tact.
But why did I get it? Did they give it away because they thought it was a bad sauce? No, they gave it to me because it was a good sauce they knew I’d enjoy but also far too crazy hot for them to handle.
Wait, did I say crazy? I meant Mad.
 
2016-04-14-19-43-22.jpg

 
Yes, that’s right, the Mad Dog range of extreme sauces now contains a sriracha. And, unlike many of their top end products, it’s all natural. Don’t think that makes it tame though because, as the name should have told you, there’s Carolina Reaper in here!
Of course, as ingredient ten out of twelve, it’s way down at the bottom of the list but it still alters the sauce quite dramatically, as I’ll be explaining later on.
For now, let’s have a quick look at the label.
 
At first glance we have what appears to be a very classic tattoo design; red roses weaving their stems around a skull that holds a banner between its teeth, all in varying degrees of metallic, providing a great eye-catching shine.
But everything is not quite what it seems, for the word “Reaper” between the teeth soon clues us in to the fact that those aren’t flowers. No, they’re Carolina Reaper pods, their scythe-like tails curling over the edges of the eye sockets.
 
It’s elegant, it’s as simple as it needs to be and has an artistic style that matches the tattoo-esque label design. The silver outline to all the text really makes it pop and the theme of death fits both with Mad Dog’s gun branding and with the heavy metal marketing of hot sauce in general.
 
But there’s one thing I don’t think it does so well. Aside from the red text at the bottom, not a single part of the bottle says sriracha.
Of course, I’m not planning on showing off this sauce after the review. I don’t really mind that it doesn’t look like sriracha on the outside. I’m more interested in what’s within and, chances are, so are you. So let’s move on.
 
Upon opening the bottle, I am immediately greeted by the strong smell of garlic, vinegar and red chillies, in that particular order. And yet, despite the strength it’s not immediately obvious what sort of each I’m smelling.
So obviously I had to try it.
 
2016-04-14-19-46-09.jpg

 
Poured onto a spoon, you can see that this is both thinner and chunkier than most other srirachas on sale in this country. This is actually more authentic, however, as the original Thai sriracha was a sweet, more liquid sauce often added to soups and would have been made by hand, instead of machine blended.
That being said, this sauce is still far from thin and its chunks are small, almost to the point of being better termed granules. It flows well, neither too much nor too little, and it feels smooth to the tongue.
 
For the first thirty seconds to a minute, I get a flavour as strong as its smell, bold and anything but subtle with its garlic, just like the sriracha I know and love, with the aforementioned red chilli bringing up the rear. But the chilli isn’t just Jalapeño and the garlic isn’t quite raw. There is an unmistakeable hit of Cayenne in the taste of the chillies and maybe just the slightest hint of the sauce’s namesake Reaper before everything subsides into a garlic-tinged sourness and relatively quick-building burn.
 
In a matter of moments, the combined fire of Reaper, Cayenne and red Jalapeño has tingled the tongue, spread round the sides and gone full blast for the upper back of my mouth and throat. And it’s this last location where it hits the hardest, reaching a heat that I will call
[SIZE=300%]6/10[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]But don’t be fooled by the relatively low number, this sauce is hot! In excess of a good Ghost Pepper product, in fact. The only reason it doesn’t score higher is because ten out of ten is reserved for the absolute top of the natural sauce range and everything is rated relative to that.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This sauce will blow your head off, be warned*.[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=medium]All in all, my friend was right. Mad Dog Reaper Sriracha may not quite fit with my idea of what a Sriracha should be but it still has a strong garlic chilli flavour that’s just as powerful and enjoyable. It will go with all the same meals, be they wings, roasts, soups, sandwiches, chips or any manner of other things. And it has the best consistency possible for all of them.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Because of its sourness, I wouldn’t put this sauce on everything and, because of its extreme heat, I wouldn’t advise you to either but, on those things I do put it, Mad Dog Reaper Sriracha is a sauce I love![/SIZE]
 
*Maybe not with some of you guys, you're tough.
 
Lucky Dog Hot Sauce said:
Have you considered rating the flavor?       
 
I like your reviews, but the heat-rating only is a let down for folks who care more about taste.   :cheers:
 
I always see the bold and think it's overall. People skim and see this, I saw a 2/10 and he liked it and I was confused for a bit until I was familiar with his posts. ;)
 
I agree with a taste or overall rating, and labeling.
 
It's certainly not all about the heat and that's very much not what I want to be, hence why nothing besides that one free review sauce has surpassed a 6 yet.
I do want to close the massive gap between Hell Unleashed and everything else I've rated, if only to better the sense of scale and remove the sheer disparity of the numbers In question. I don't, however, want to sacrifice flavour for it and in fact list that as one of the reasons I don't do stupid youtube challenge videos (the other is I'm an emotional person who's on the spot descriptions are vastly inferior to those I've had time to think through and put into words).
 
Heat may be the number in bold but that's because it is, predominantly a quantative value. Sure, there are various subtleties to how it hits but the important bits of those can generally be summed up in a small paragraph or even just a sentence. It is important that people see it though because it tells them whether or not the sauce is something that they, personally, can handle. And if you can't handle the heat, does the flavour even matter?
 
Do remember that, while heat can definitely be enjoyable, it is also a entrance barrier to enjoying the flavour so, even if the latter is ultimately the deciding factor on quality, the former is still very important. And I like to play it up because I find many reviewers just don't seem clear enough on what the heat level actually is.
 
That said, if you guys are scrolling through, seeing 2/10 and thinking "well, that's clearly a bad sauce", I obviously need to change something there. I am not sure I feel happy about putting a number on flavour because it's far more of a qualitative thing than heat and I don't want to imply that my opinions are more clear cut scientific than they are when, for example with the Dragons Breath, other reviewers can have wildly differing veiws on the worth of the exact same taste.
Would changing the bold black number to something with a fire pattern, say, help get the point across that the number refers solely to potency or does this issue require a more complicated solution?
 
Just label it heat
 
Heat
6/10
 
And it clears up at least the confusion. ;)
 
It's so large and bold, it looks like an overall score.
 
PS. Keep up the good reviews.
 
Argh, that simultaneously simplifies and complicates the issue for now I have to work out whether I want the better verbal/textual flow of
6/10
Heat
or the greater look and clarity of keeping the two your way round. Good thing I have most of a week to decide.
 
The Hot Pepper said:
Just label it heat
 
Heat
6/10
 
And it clears up at least the confusion. ;)
 
It's so large and bold, it looks like an overall score.
 
PS. Keep up the good reviews.
That's what happened to me the 1st few reviews.

Don't get me wrong OP - I've enjoyed your reviews and I think you do a fine job describing the flavor and sometimes food pairings.

But yeah, like THP said, many here will simply skim and see a big bold "4/10" and assume it's a crappy sauce.

Rating heat and flavor would be best/my suggestion, though calling out the bold as heat-specific in large font would help.

Was just givin constructive feedback - no offense intended. I enjoy your reviews. :cheers:
 
I understand and appologize if I came across as offended, I merely meant to explain my stance and why I don't already do what you suggest.
 
Back
Top