-
We welcome content that is not political, divisive, or offensive. If we feel your content leans this way or has the potential to, it may be removed at any time. A hot pepper forum is not the place for such content. Thank you for respecting the community!
NBA FINALS ..who do you pick?
- Thread starter Wiriwiri
- Start date
Golden State
golden state.
Warriors bench > Cavs starters....... Last year LeBitch was complaining that they were not healthy and that the warriors beat their bench basically. Now the warriors bench owned Cavs starters. So good.
Top 5 teams in the NBA this year:
Dubs
OKC
Spurs
Dubs bench
Cavs
Dubs
OKC
Spurs
Dubs bench
Cavs
I've said dubs in 5 since they made the finals, but after seeing these two games, could be a sweep.
All the preseason talk about how the dubs got lucky since Cavs didn't have Irving or Love.
Then they won 73 and everyone all like, "yeah, but Cavs swept through the playoffs! They're rested! They're at full strength!"
East = tissue paper soft. I'm talking 3-ply quilted.
Wake up call.
If OKC had made it, it would be the same result. Cavs are overrated - James is good, but he's not what he was, and while everyone's so busy calling the dubs a "jump shooting team" they don't seem to notice what a great inside game they have and how good they are on defense.
And that bench - dubs bench would be a 3 or 4 seed in the East. True story.
All the preseason talk about how the dubs got lucky since Cavs didn't have Irving or Love.
Then they won 73 and everyone all like, "yeah, but Cavs swept through the playoffs! They're rested! They're at full strength!"
East = tissue paper soft. I'm talking 3-ply quilted.
Wake up call.
If OKC had made it, it would be the same result. Cavs are overrated - James is good, but he's not what he was, and while everyone's so busy calling the dubs a "jump shooting team" they don't seem to notice what a great inside game they have and how good they are on defense.
And that bench - dubs bench would be a 3 or 4 seed in the East. True story.
I'd rather seen OKC in it. Same results but a better game.
The way OKC plays defense it might've been even uglier.robbyjoe01 said:
It seems as though they give up in the 3rd,so I didn't even watch the 4th...no team effort whatsoever...one man can't be held accountable,
James made some errors that made me wonder if he's had it..& they rest of the team just followed in a lackadaisical fashion.
I could see it over in 4 esp., if LOVE is gone,anywho,he did not play well before he got wacked ..& no foul called ?... LOVE lost.
James made some errors that made me wonder if he's had it..& they rest of the team just followed in a lackadaisical fashion.
I could see it over in 4 esp., if LOVE is gone,anywho,he did not play well before he got wacked ..& no foul called ?... LOVE lost.
It's sad that I can't read a single word of your post in that ridiculous font. It's just way too tiny on my phone 
OK, I screen Dip so that I could look at the photograph and enlarge it.
1. You missed nothing in the fourth. There were eight minutes of garbage time.
2. I like the noncall for a foulwith the Love injury - there was nothing inntentional about it, it was on a tough rebounding play, and that is the definition of incidental contact.
OK, I screen Dip so that I could look at the photograph and enlarge it.
1. You missed nothing in the fourth. There were eight minutes of garbage time.
2. I like the noncall for a foulwith the Love injury - there was nothing inntentional about it, it was on a tough rebounding play, and that is the definition of incidental contact.