Dave2000 said:Not sure that peppers would like the smoke residue, but certain soils are better used indoors after sterilized one way or another, to cut down on gnats if nothing else. Yeah it'll kill the microbes but as far as bacteria goes, it'll be recolonized in a few days after water is added. I just don't see the soil being the limitation on this grow unless it compacts too much and rots the roots, or of course if there is too little of it!
And that's a problem why, exactly? The presence of fungii is indicative of a rich, healthy substrate. Organic growers strive for a soil web that is interlaced with fungii. If you're not growing organically, and like dealing with all of the issues that surround trying to maintain a sterile medium, well OK. You guys are usually the ones that are experts in identifying pests and diseases, because you get them all, eventually.Literally, in some geographic regions if that packaged soil at the store wasn't sterilized ahead of time, especially when stored outdoors during a rainy season, there would be mushrooms growing out of torn bags!
Why would you want to prevent microbes? Why would anyone even try?but IMO far far too much emphasis is often placed on microbes in this forum as if they're some rare or elusive thing when you can't really prevent them without exotic, repetitive chemical treatment.
Umm, yeah. Growing peppers indoors is cool, but not very practical. Growing weed indoors is understandable. Maybe this is just baby steps in the evolution of a grower? LOLOn the other hand, this is yet another reason why I'd recommend growing outdoors instead of inside in AR. Let nature do it's thing, as close to what the plants evolved to thrive in as possible.
You are assuming that I've oversimplified something, here. I look at this a bit more philosophically than you do. For me, this is more like trying to treat cancer with chemotherapy. Sure, you get the bad cells, but you do it at the expense of the entire immune system. In many cases, it's not the cancer that's going to kill you, but that cold you catch on some Sunday afternoon. When you choose a synthetic regimen, you have taken away the natural mechanisms, and become responsible to give that plant everything that it needs, in a readily available form. If something fails, you have to troubleshoot it, and be aware of the interactions with other processes in the plant. I'm lazy. I'd rather keep my soil alive, and let it provide. You know, like nature. And I do think you greatly overstate the competition of microbes in the substrate. Unless there is something pathogenic - which is pretty rare - it's pretty unnecessary to try to guess what it is good and bad in the soil web. This isn't really where this topic was meant to go, though, now was it?Organic growers are not some kind of stereotypical group that do xyz. The idea that pests and diseases are more likely with people who eliminate mold, fungus, insects, is backwards, though nobody tries, or at least succeeds to maintain a sterile soil. It's just a reset of the poor conditions at the soil processing facility or sitting out at a gardening store.
Then you haven't met an actual botanical scientist. I actually dated one for a couple months -she studied the effect of root nematodes on soybean crop yields. If you were to ask a real scientist, they most certainly could tell you that beneficial microbes are those which do two things: A) do not harm the plant and B) provide something beneficial to the plant such as breaking down more complex organic matter to more easily utilized nutrients, or providing reduced susceptibility to disease. They could give you a few examples such as Enterobacter cloacae, Anthrobacter globiformis, Anthrobacter nicotianae, and some of the Pseudomona species. They could tell you that harmful microbes (such as the tobacco mosaic virus or Pseudomona aeruginosa) are those which cause disease or reduce the overall health of the plant. As far as what microbes in what quantity you need. . . no one is going to tell you that, because you as a layperson can't do anything with that information. Are you going to go down to the local home & garden store and ask for some Anthrobacter globiformis? If you could manage to acquire some, could you count them to determine how much water you need to add to reach 800,000-1,000,000 cells/milliliter? No.solid7 said:No disrespect to your field or experience - I don't disagree with your assertion - but you won't find a single plant scientist anywhere who can definitively explain the difference between beneficial or harmful microbes to any acceptable degree. Their interactions, what they are doing at what time, and sometimes, even which is which. I have never met someone who can tell me what microbes I need in what quantity.
Sorry, you are going above and beyond to prove a point. The interactions of all those different microbes in a soil web are something on the order of mapping geonomes. (except that's actually been done) They are complex symbiotic relationships, which are not (in a purely scientific context) well understood. Yes, specific ones are, no doubt. They are understood well enough to form the *basis* of a science. Soil biology is still a young and growing field - especially with the modern trend of sustainable farming. Wikipedia to confirm this as quickly as you've told me what you know.Then you haven't met an actual botanical scientist. I actually dated one for a couple months -she studied the effect of root nematodes on soybean crop yields. If you were to ask a real scientist, they most certainly could tell you that beneficial microbes are those which do two things: A) do not harm the plant and B) provide something beneficial to the plant such as breaking down more complex organic matter to more easily utilized nutrients, or providing reduced susceptibility to disease. They could give you a few examples such as Enterobacter cloacae, Anthrobacter globiformis, Anthrobacter nicotianae, and some of the Pseudomona species. They could tell you that harmful microbes (such as the tobacco mosaic virus or Pseudomona aeruginosa) are those which cause disease or reduce the overall health of the plant. As far as what microbes in what quantity you need. . . no one is going to tell you that, because you as a layperson can't do anything with that information. Are you going to go down to the local home & garden store and ask for some Anthrobacter globiformis? If you could manage to acquire some, could you count them to determine how much water you need to add to reach 800,000-1,000,000 cells/milliliter? No.
Plants are not my area of research and look what I could tell you. Talking to a botanical scientist would blow your mind.
Nothing wrong with being a layperson. I've no formal education in botany and even managed to poison myself from fertilizer exposure a few years back, but I've been growing since knee high to a grasshopper, and more recently have managed to raise a stink on this forum enough to get people to post a lot of good info, and I did once stay in a Holiday Inn Express.solid7 said:While I choose not to reveal what my profession or education is, I can assure you that I am not a layperson. I have worked very closely with scientists in the fields of Biology and Natural Sciences.
You're right -I really did go a little above and beyond to prove a point, sorry. But the point was that your assertion that "you won't find a single plant scientist anywhere that can explain the difference between beneficial and harmful microbes to any acceptable degree" is just completely incorrect. Hell, most college students studying botany could answer that question correctly, and they still have to earn their bachelors and then get a Ph.D. before being called a scientist.solid7 said:Sorry, you are going above and beyond to prove a point.
You're welcome. I was simply trying to tell you that soil microbes are a largely uncharted frontier, and there are so many that have not even been identified, much less function documented. (or to put it another way, we don't know what they really do) Always be a good scientist, and keep your mind open to emerging concepts in soil microbiology. Because we really don't know that much about soil biochemistry, all things being relative. LOLYou're right -I really did go a little above and beyond to prove a point, sorry. But the point was that your assertion that "you won't find a single plant scientist anywhere that can explain the difference between beneficial and harmful microbes to any acceptable degree" is just completely incorrect. Hell, most college students studying botany could answer that question correctly, and they still have to earn their bachelors and then get a Ph.D. before being called a scientist.
Anyway, I appreciate the advice about my peppers needing to be re-potted to a better draining mix. I'm going to do that as soon as I get home.