It appears I’ve some “explaining” to do lest everyone think I’m nuts. I’m not, been tested (not fictionally as the sit com science dude) but “really” many times.
I enjoy the antics here and my participation in the threads. To me, it is a vital part of this unique gathering of individuals from around the world. Like you reading now, some I find interesting, some helpful, some humorous , some off-putting and a few.. well a bit creepy.. Such as it is.
Often my posts are double entendres. Some catch it, some don’t. Again, part of the cool tapestry here. Doesn’t make me better or smarter, just a piece of the puzzle.
In this thread there has been a bit of it all. Humor, intellect, pokes, prods and some oddness too! Entertainment, mental challenges, product awareness and dare I add, a bit of history as well.
My last few posts I did so not to bewilder, quite the contrary. But to provoke thought. Perhaps I missed my point, lest the “explaining.”
I made a “campy” point to say that “many oysters” needed to be opened to find some pearls..
GIP posted a clip from a 1970s movie that created such as
Saturday Night Live, the Canadian counterpart
SCTV and
Cheech and Chong. Indeed Chevy Chase’s first film role was here.
So the odd clip I posted of someone breaking open a shellfish to find “pearls” wasn’t a nutjob posting a random vid, but a meager attempt to show an allegory to what I believe to be “pearls” here offered by all.
I still might be “crazy” but tests confirm I am not.
