Well that's the problem my friend, you take it too literally. it's not even from the Caribbean.
This was my main objection, and the only reason I reposted to correct your response. Your history and grammar lesson did not really address this issue, but it looks to be a great resource for new chile pepper growers that want to know about C. Chinense and its origins.
Getting back to the issue at hand, you have stated the following:
1. "All Caribbean Reds are Habaneros, but not all red Habaneros are Caribbean Reds." --- I think this is well understood, and it seems to me that you do actually believe that all Caribbean Reds are Habaneros.
2. "Habaneros are what C. chinense's are called in the Mexico area." --- Caribbean Red Habaneros originate from the Yucatan Peninsula, which is in Mexico, so this still backs up the claim that it is a variety of red Habanero.
3. "it's a C. chinense, because of its origin has the "Habanero" bit in its name and it's red. that's the only similarities with other red Habaneros. it's not a variety of red Habanero." --- Okay this one was just confusing, because it is a bit contradictory based on Statements 1 and 2. You first say that all Caribbean Reds are Habaneros but then you say that it's not a variety of red Habanero? That logic doesn't follow. The color is red. It is a Habanero. There is more than one variety of red Habanero, the Carribean Red Habanero being one of them. I am not claiming any other connection to other red Habaneros than this, and you have yet to explain why I am wrong.
4. "it's not even from the Caribbean." --- I repeated this for emphasis, and I think another helpful THP member reconfirmed that the Yucatan is both in Mexico and the Caribbean. This is a fact and is irrefutable. You posted a follow up link in your history lesson that stated the origin was from the Yucatan Peninsula, which backs up my claim that the Caribbean Red Habanero is in fact from the Caribbean.
As much as I enjoy brushing up on my debate and reasoning skills, I see no reason to continue unless you can specifically comment on these points with relevant information. I think this post speaks for itself, and others can draw their own conclusions by evaluating the merit of both our arguments. I will say that I appreciate the general tone of our posts, and perhaps you can sticky this as proof that two people can debate a topic without resorting to flame wars