My point is he may have a chinensis that looks like an annumor frutescens species
Omri said
"The only reason why one would call "it" a Chinense is relying on the early "Naga Jolokia" reports.
Long and pointy = Annuum (Frutescens at best)
The only Chinense "Naga" is Naga Morich (of course there's the Bhut and Bih as well).
Even without the tests (that showed it's Annuum), just take a good look at the plant.
Chinense plants have special characteristics."
and I'm saying that is just to vague a statement without looking at the plant particuliarly the flowers and how they grow. hence the Willard would love this thread statement...it just bugs me thats all.
Omri said
"The only reason why one would call "it" a Chinense is relying on the early "Naga Jolokia" reports.
Long and pointy = Annuum (Frutescens at best)
The only Chinense "Naga" is Naga Morich (of course there's the Bhut and Bih as well).
Even without the tests (that showed it's Annuum), just take a good look at the plant.
Chinense plants have special characteristics."
and I'm saying that is just to vague a statement without looking at the plant particuliarly the flowers and how they grow. hence the Willard would love this thread statement...it just bugs me thats all.