Thank you for sharing that article, Capsicum, it is an interesting read. When I read it I was struck by the fact that some nutritionist was speaking about the impact of pesticides upon the body. Wouldn't a chemist or a biologist be a better person to ask about the current state of research into the physiology of consuming pesticides? I'm pretty thorough, so I went out and googled the person cited in the article from Science Daily. I came across this scathing critique of her statements:
http://www.nutritionresearchcenter.org/healthnews/organics-are-better-article-is-so-slanted-it-can-make-you-sicker-than-a-bag-of-ddt/
I don't like he said/she said types of debates so I wanted to confirm that there is actually research out there that supports the assertion that organic food is better for you. This is another counter argument that refutes the assertion that "levels of pesticides currently used haven't been found to be harmful."
http://howtoeliminatepain.com/pesticides/statistics-on-why-food-pesticides-are-so-dangerous-to-your-health/
What is not in this link is that agriculture in North America is shaped more and more by Mosanto, and Mosanto basically has politicians in their back pocket (a whole other topic that is well documented, but outside of what this forum is about). Guess who decides which type of research is funded, and who makes the decision about what levels of pesticides are "safe"? I think it is absolutely inevitable that some pseudo quack researchers will try to make a quick buck by selling their souls and telling the public that supermarket food that has been sprayed down by dozens if not hundreds of toxic chemicals is just as good for you as organic produce. They are as credible as those teams of scientists in the 60s and 70s who conducted all sorts of "research" showing that smoking is not harmful.
http://www.nutritionresearchcenter.org/healthnews/organics-are-better-article-is-so-slanted-it-can-make-you-sicker-than-a-bag-of-ddt/
I don't like he said/she said types of debates so I wanted to confirm that there is actually research out there that supports the assertion that organic food is better for you. This is another counter argument that refutes the assertion that "levels of pesticides currently used haven't been found to be harmful."
http://howtoeliminatepain.com/pesticides/statistics-on-why-food-pesticides-are-so-dangerous-to-your-health/
What is not in this link is that agriculture in North America is shaped more and more by Mosanto, and Mosanto basically has politicians in their back pocket (a whole other topic that is well documented, but outside of what this forum is about). Guess who decides which type of research is funded, and who makes the decision about what levels of pesticides are "safe"? I think it is absolutely inevitable that some pseudo quack researchers will try to make a quick buck by selling their souls and telling the public that supermarket food that has been sprayed down by dozens if not hundreds of toxic chemicals is just as good for you as organic produce. They are as credible as those teams of scientists in the 60s and 70s who conducted all sorts of "research" showing that smoking is not harmful.