Nope. But have seen people confuse the pot number system with volume. Scroll to bottom of this link for their chart: http://www.greenhousemegastore.com/product/elite-nursery-container/nursery-potsjuanitos said:you're confusing pot# with volume.. the pot# is just an approximation and doesn't garuntee volume.
Oh damn that is funny on so many levels. Biggest one being this is a 'standard'.floricole said:
#1 container may be smaller or larger than 1 gal
I posted that explanation here, and on Gardenweb a long time ago. That is the explanation I was told by my college horticulture teacher, David McLean. http://thehotpepper.com/topic/38473-5-gallon-pots-are-not-5-gallons-word/?p=805194ajdrew said:Nope. But have seen people confuse the pot number system with volume. Scroll to bottom of this link for their chart: http://www.greenhousemegastore.com/product/elite-nursery-container/nursery-pots
Five gallon "Trade Size" has an actual volume of 3.8 gallons.
One gallon "Trade Size" has an actual volume of 3 quarts.
Someone in another forum gave me the strangest explanation. She might be goofing with me. It might be urban legend. But here goes. After WWII, there were US manufacturers who had a huge surplus of the cans they used for K rations. A gallon would hold a gallon of food, a five gallon would hold five gallons of food. But because the war was over, the government wasnt ordering K rations. So they got stuck with tons of these standard sized cans. To get rid of them, they punched holes in the bottoms and sold them as plant pots.
So many were sold, that a standard was set for their size. Ah but when they ran out, new production was tapered so they would stack for easy shipping and storage. So the normal outer diameter of the food container became the top diameter of the tapered pots. The size people called one gallon kept on being called that even though being tapered it only held 3 quarts.
Is it true? I dunno but I know if I buy a five gallon plant pot it is much smaller than a five gallon bucket of paint.
Oh damn that is funny on so many levels. Biggest one being this is a 'standard'.
Oh damn I like that one even better. I suspect all are likely bs, but I like that one more.thegreenman said:I posted that explanation here, and on Gardenweb a long time ago. That is the explanation I was told by my college horticulture teacher, David McLean. http://thehotpepper.com/topic/38473-5-gallon-pots-are-not-5-gallons-word/?p=805194
The story gets better. Someone pointed me to a story of how Lowes has been sued and lost 1.6 million over exactly what you just mentioned.hot stuff said:I just figured it was legalized theft like the lumber industry.
Did you check the link? Lowes got sued, lost 1.6 million over it. I laughed my ass off.hot stuff said:Well lumber companies for decades have standardized theft by having 2x4 be something more along the lines of 1.75x3.75 or something like that.
Yeah, but I'm thinking they must have had boards that were even less than industry standards, in which a 2x4 is not really a 2x4. If they were sued for the industry standard of a 2x4 which is not a 2x4 then the whole industry has been turned on their heads and a lot of new labels are going to have to me made for every store.ajdrew said:Did you check the link? Lowes got sued, lost 1.6 million over it. I laughed my ass off.
floricole said:
from http://americanhort.org/documents/ansi_nursery_stock_standards_americanhort_2014.pdf
1 gal = 231 Cubic Inches
#1 container may be smaller or larger than 1 gal
you must choose the right manufacturer who manufactures a pot the size you want
ajdrew said:Oh damn I like that one even better. I suspect all are likely bs, but I like that one more.
The story gets better. Someone pointed me to a story of how Lowes has been sued and lost 1.6 million over exactly what you just mentioned.
http://www.marinij.com/article/ZZ/20140827/NEWS/140827791