^ good post =)
when all of us on this forum are hobbyists?
(I)t would take half a lifetime to read the dna of both before you would be able to find the diference between the too. Plus it costs over 1 million dollars just for the microscope to view it. Im sure NMSU has the microscope but the test costs a lot of money and to view all the genetic diferences between to things of the same species the way your speaking of i think is close to imposible. The way you see the genetic diference between two specimens would be to count how many of pairs in a specific pattern occur in a dna strand. patterns look like the following but a lot larger:
I know i might not be an expert but i just went over this in bio i might be wrong on a few things aswell dont quote me on this stuff but i know alot of this "dna" testing is BS and its actualy Chromosone testing
thanks for the info man i just read over my textbooks and i realized my mistakesIt's awesome that you are expressing interest in genetics. If your interest continues into college, there you will learn you don't need a microscope to "look" at DNA. There are many tools available to the geneticist, molecular biologist, and biologist to analyze and "look at" DNA. Relatively speaking it doesn't take that long, however it does take longer than what they show on TV crime shows. It's quite complicated to get into, and I highly recommend picking up a college level advanced genetics book if you want to learn more about the topic. High school Bio just touches the surface.
For example (In general terms): I send termite DNA (from several individuals of the same colony) down to another lab that does their thing (analyzes then compares the DNA). A few weeks later they tell me which termite species it is. If they didn't have a back log, I would get the info even faster. We do this because visually identifying Reticulitermes species is very unreliable and for our research we need to know we are only working with Reticulitermes flavipes! There are about 5 species of Reticulitermes in Indiana, and trust me they look VERY similar to one another! No microscope is used by the way, just "machines", computers, and statistical programs.
It does cost us a couple hundred of dollars or so for each sample.
For some reason I can't keep myself from responding to this.
Pepperjoe, no offense intended, but I think the joke is on you. With your "experience" you should have been tipped off by the whole China thing, that this is BS.....
I recommend doing some reading and research on Capsicum natural history.
I wish the record would only be allowed for land race or heirloom varieties, so we wouldn't get polluted by this kind of "stuff" all of the time.
Maybe this is a joke and I still don't get it?
China! C'mon......seriously.....
Someone please let me know if this is a joke because I really can't tell, and I don't want to make offense to anyone either way, but when someone is going the wrong direction I think it is a responsibility for us to correct them, so that error and misconception does not spread to the naive.
^^Agree with the above post. Its more towards DNA profiling than full genome sequencing (which for you would be chromosome testing) as a lot of species are already in the DNA databases.
sorry patrick i meant to say certain traits or genes or alleles (they are all the same) and i never said the scientists are wrong. i believe a lot of them are right but i do have to say a lot of this sounds wrong or is not written down right and sounds more like its for buisness or money purposes. And i highly doubt that pods from two diferent plants that were not cloned could have the same exact dna. I will give it a 1 in 6 billion chance lol (not actual numbers or anything just making a joke)