Does anyone use rock dust like azomite? does it really help plants? is there such thing as to much?
i would like to hear your thoughts on rock dust
i would like to hear your thoughts on rock dust
From what I understand Azomite is derived from volcanic sources. I personally have had amazing results with glacial derived mineral supplements.Jetchuka said:A little bit of Azomite can go a long way, especially for container mixes. Or if you are planting in the ground you can drop and mix a heaping tablespoon into the planting hole. I put a little into seedling mixes as well. I prefer the dust form because it is micronized and super-fine. Thery have big affordable bags of the pelletized version, good to spread over whole plots where it should last at least a few seasons.
Some people's soil need it more than others, no way of knowing without a proper soil test. I consider it more of a growing "optimization" thing, most people shouldn't expect miracles even with flavor. I imagine it'll fill up your veggies with vitamins closer to their full potential, as long as the soil PH is within range etc etc. It is also an excellent source of sillicates.
You can toxify your soil with micro-nutrients, that's why less is better sometimes, your product will last longer that way anyway.
I find Azomite cheapest at Kelp4Less.com and Ebay, usually with free shipping. I would compare prices at both places and go with what's cheapest.
Why is a glacial source suppose to be better then a volcanic one? Unless I'm misunderstanding and you didn't mean to imply that.Hells Bells said:From what I understand Azomite is derived from volcanic sources. I personally have had amazing results with glacial derived mineral supplements.
From what I've read others have too...
From what I've read the glacial source is more readily available to the plant, whereas the volcanic mined minerals are not.Monkey Hunter said:Why is a glacial source suppose to be better then a volcanic one? Unless I'm misunderstanding and you didn't mean to imply that.
I
Greensand is another option, personally I'd be surprised if it really there was much of a difference between them all as plants really aren't that particular when you're talking about micronutrients. Which is why I choose to use invasive plants with deep roots harvested from the bush. It's cheaper, socially responsible as it helps reduce invasive pressure, environmentally friendly as it doesn't involve shipping things all around and costs less. Especially as most places in North America have rampant issues with "weeds".
For sure!Monkey Hunter said:Thanks for the offer, I'll look into it more as I haven't since I got out of indoor cultivation. Back then I tried a bunch of side by side tests with mineral supplements and didn't find any appreciable advantage in either yield or quality. I was using a high quality, complete soluble fertilizer though which may have nullified any advantage. If ya have any good references you could toss me I'd appreciate it as I spend too much time reading on the net about gardening/farming as is...
Azomite is both volcanic and seabed deposits. Not sure if you've seen it yet but check this for a better explanation: http://azomite.com/history.htmlHells Bells said:From what I understand Azomite is derived from volcanic sources. I personally have had amazing results with glacial derived mineral supplements.
From what I've read others have too...