Weed said:
No, I literally opened that sentence with "Most of" ...
-
We welcome content that is not political, divisive, or offensive. If we feel your content leans this way or has the potential to, it may be removed at any time. A hot pepper forum is not the place for such content. Thank you for respecting the community!
Women in US combat possitions
- Thread starter AJ Drew
- Start date
No, I literally opened that sentence with "Most of" ...
Dude, it's my turn to get to answer w/ two words for a while ... you'll have to write the whole sentences for the rest of tonight ...
#bored
I think there needs to be some real discernment here. Let's take an example from individual sport performance, such as running or swimming. There has yet to be a woman runner or swimmer who is faster than the fastest male at a given point in time/progression in the sports. As a general rule, it's just a fact that men are physically stronger than women. Not all things related to combat these days necessarily rely on physical strength or speed, though, so there are things where a given woman's non-physical abilities are ideal and even physical differences can be the perfect solution to a given problem - Rawk's small size being a case in point. Plus, it doesn't take massive strength to drive a tank or a drone, or shoot a gun. But if it came down to hand-to-hand combat, or even hauling your inured mate to safety, generally men are going to have the upper hand. Generally. We all know both men and women who fit the somatotypes of ectomorph, mesomorph, and endomorph - some women are more than capable of kicking some men's butts 100% of the time. So basically I think there needs to be both job-based and individual-based discernment when deciding if ANY individual should fill a given job, combat or otherwise.
I think, though, that I object to the use of "created" there ...
I'd prefer "evolved" =)
interesting point here.
women get injured like 3x more frequently than men when loaded to the same weight, doing the same shit. supposedly down to bone density and musculature rather than general strength.
testosterone yo. its why the skyscrapers are so tall.
women get injured like 3x more frequently than men when loaded to the same weight, doing the same shit. supposedly down to bone density and musculature rather than general strength.
testosterone yo. its why the skyscrapers are so tall.
queequeg152 said:
I wonder what sort of a workout plan it used to develop its kidneys so thoroughly.
edit: Oh, Jesus. I accidentally hit the "like"button instead of "quote" at first. queequeg, please don't get the wrong idea.
grantmichaels said:
I think, though, that I object to the use of "created" there ...
I'd prefer "evolved" =)
But they use "created" in the good book. Why would you say evolved?
http://biblehub.com/genesis/2-22.htm
Edit. I couldn't let anything think I was actually serious. This might as well have been a post by PMD if I was.
is pmd still around?
queequeg152 said:
Not for a while. He seemed to take it hard when he got one of his own threads locked by being a butthole in said thread.
geeme said:
Indeed, but the "like" still shows up in his notifications. I couldn't let that one go unexplained.
Jeff H said:
Yes, but only in his notifications. No one else knows. For instance, how many times did I like this post?? It doesn't show that I liked it at all.
Prove it.
