rabbit said:I know this sounds screwed up, but it's true. A dead robber can't sue
No, but his family can.
rabbit said:I know this sounds screwed up, but it's true. A dead robber can't sue
rabbit said:Messing with Potawies plants!!.............They are lucky to have gotten away!
True. However, there's still the court room. I would definitely hope I'm never in that situation. I have been overseas, but war's a little different. Personally I would hope people can just respect things and shooting someone would be the last thing I want to do. However, I'm with a couple other people on here. If there's a robber in my house, and I can access a gun I will. Shoot them necesarily. Probably not. Usually that's enough for someone to leave. Trust me, having to have use that threat before works quite well. It's oddly an amazing breaker of the language barrier. Make an advance towards me in my own house though in the middle of the night. No if's and's or butts about it. The person's dead and if there family wants to be retarded enough to attempt a lawsuit later they are more than welcome too. They'd better have a good lawyer though. Self defense is something that holds up quite well in the courts. Enough of that though. It's not something I would ever hope would occur, but in that situation that's how it is.DevilDuck said:No, but his family can.
POTAWIE said:Its not like I would shoot some kids for stealing a pepper but I know I did scare the living sh@t out of them
rabbit said:The person's dead and if there family wants to be retarded enough to attempt a lawsuit later they are more than welcome too. They'd better have a good lawyer though. Self defense is something that holds up quite well in the courts. Enough of that though. It's not something I would ever hope would occur, but in that situation that's how it is.
Sickmont said:Be careful. State laws vary widely on the definition of 'self-defense' and most especially when deadly force is an issue. Florida had one of the stupidest, most convoluted definitions of it i've ever seen. So bad, in fact, that up until about 2 or 3 years ago, you would have had been in a much better legal position if you had just stabbed the shit out of a home invader and let him bleed to death as opposed to shooting the f**ker in the kneecap. That would've been almost instant jail time.
See folks? That's one of the major reasons I never touch anything outside of the psychadelics.cyakker said:Aaaahhh... the wonders of crystal meth.
Chiliac said:I'm not sure if local authorities would accept your permission to shoot trespassers as an excuse! If I ever get to Texas I'll let you introduce me to the art of treating uninvited visitors, mate!!!
I apologize for straying myself as well. It's REALLY easy to get off of topic. Honesty, sorry about that it doesn't take long to veer off into the twilight zonecyakker said:Whoa.
See... really I was just kind of curious about potential liability of a "crime of opportunity/curiosity/stupidity". Like someone walking home from the bar, a teenage dare, or some such. Not really anything with a malicious intent. Not something that I really worry a lot about, it just wanders around in the back of my head (it's crowded back there).
But since we've wandered into "home invasions" -- I had a guy walk into my house at 3am last year, and then argue with me that he wasn't in the wrong place when I found him standing (yeah, just standing there) in my living room.
Aaaahhh... the wonders of crystal meth.
I'm in one of my nerdy research modes. I'll research it AJ. Something else to look up... I'll keep it off of here though.AlabamaJack said:I removed all my post concerning property protection Chiliac...I got way off subject...apologies to cyakker...
if you care what the law is in Texas concerning this issue, please reference Texas Penal Code, Chapter 9...(google it)
What if I were to drunkenly eat a Naga? That's something I would actually do if I was pretty wasted. I remember the last time I was drunk. I took a tablespoon of DM MKII. That really hurt tooGrumpyBear said:if someone drunkenly steals and eats a naga then comes to physical harm as a result that's just natural selection, you're doing the species a favour.
rabbit said:What if I were to drunkenly eat a Naga? That's something I would actually do if I was pretty wasted. I remember the last time I was drunk. I took a tablespoon of DM MKII. That really hurt too
AlabamaJack said:I removed all my post concerning property protection Chiliac...I got way off subject...apologies to cyakker...
if you care what the law is in Texas concerning this issue, please reference Texas Penal Code, Chapter 9...(google it)
GrumpyBear said:if you already know it's a naga that's a whole other drunken story, i'm referring to the drunken "i wonder what that is, i'm gonna eat it" concept...