3/5King, I don't need to "brown nose" anybody - Chad is a friend of mine from here, I was trading with him long before you were even a member, some of his seeds are growing in my place right now!
And your attempt to "pop my bubble" doesn't hold-up. Sure, everybody is interested in seeing the train make another trip, but
only after everybody that wanted to participate in the first round gets a chance to do so. The re-route did not even crop-up until Post #45 and after, so comments on how things were going
prior to the re-routing even happening would not apply. The idea for a second round actually came-up when Chad's thread was barely more than a week old, and the thread still quite active.
In any event, that matter has already been resolved. The member who proposed, and most strongly promoted, a second round, and who would have personally benefited from the suggested re-route, even agreed -
I agree that it should go to everyone on the list before it takes it second tour
Likewise, even the person who actually proposed the re-route agreed to withdraw it! -
fine with me... how many cars is this train going to have in that case?
So that issue has already been resolved, the only question at present is whether to limit the # of new participants, or to follow the stated objective of Chad's Train to get it out to as many people as possible.
The current participants are already set, the issue is whether or not to limit new participants
AFTER us. Note that I have no personal gain in suggesting we should not restrict
future participants prematurely, and I resent the repeated attempts to discredit my position by falsely claiming otherwise.
Nor am I intrinsically against a second round, as you suggest.
Rather, as I understand it, a few of the participants would prefer that we limit new participants, in order to expedite a second round for
us, before giving new people any chance to participate.
This is not dissimilar to the previous situation, except now
I'm one of the people getting the extra benefit ahead of the new folks.
So forgive me if I get a bit "miffed" when someone claims that I am paradoxically being greedy when I suggest my willingness to "give up" the personal benefits of an expedited second round, in order to allow more members to benefit from this during the planting season, in according with the objective stated by Chad when he started this.
Look, if some of you feel that we should restrict or limit new participants in some fashion, then let's stop with all this name-calling, personal attacks, accusations, feigned offenses, attempts to personally discredit, sideways parting shots, and other similar nonsense, and discuss when/how/if we should do so like civil adults.
Because right now, the poor new participants are likely too scared to even try to board Chad's train, not knowing if they will be let on, refused a ticket, or physically tossed off the back of a moving train!
But let's start treating fellow members with
respect, and stop all this nonsense. NOW.
Thank You.