Come on THP, I have been playing stringed musical instruments since I was 14 and I hear every instrument in songs note for note many times but that's not what I am looking for.The Hot Pepper said:Really? So you've never "felt" music or heard stuff in it that isn't actually there? You need some good records man.
Once again it is not about enjoying the music as I do that already. I am looking for truth, that's it. This is a scientific argument not a subjective hearing argument.
Nothing wrong with that! Take my wine example. If a wine has chocolate notes, and there is no chocolate in it, but people taste it, so it is perceived, then what is wrong with that? A computer could spit out a stat and call you crazy. Enjoy the wine. Enjoy the music. Let your ears tell you what you like. Not a computer.
I am not looking for frequencies in the range outside the human ear, I am looking for the ones we do hear and whether they are true or not. This is about tone not sounds below or above our hearing spectrum.
Maybe a stat doesn't lie but it will also tell you frequencies you can't even hear on a record. I say open your ears and enjoy. Some people like their tone and swear by it.
I want to know if the wood really does make a difference or not objectively? That's all!
I agree Phil. I heard very little discernible difference. I guarantee you if you played the same guitar and called it both Guitar A and Guitar B people would still hear a difference.Phil said:I was going to follow the video post with a comment saying....... I simply can't hear a difference. Hat tip to you, PMD. If the difference is so minute that it takes a machine to pick it up, then is it really that much of a difference? I posted the video as a way of saying you may have a point.