Shane - Put me first in line to sponsor and contribute to your legal fund to fight the mighty 'Suckerbutt / PepperSchmuck combine' law suit.stc3248 said:The thing is...I don't think their claim to the name will hold up if selling the pods or seeds produced unless they made you sign the contract before you purchased the seeds. Otherwise every farmer that grew anything would have to pay royalties to the originator. I don't see a judge backing that claim. It is reasonable that someone purchasing seeds is doing so to raise a crop...and what they do with it is up to them. You can't sell folks the seeds then once everyone is done with the initial big buy change the rules and try to claim you have any rights over the crop produced. I think its all a giant scare tactic to keep their money grab going. Turns my stomach...I am very tempted to sell every bit of powder I produce at 25 cents over the cost of shipping to force them to take me to court...
oh...sorry. They're not stable, the end kindly disregard the above post...unless you wanna read it.
SanPatricio said:Shane - Put me first in line to sponsor and contribute to your legal fund to fight the mighty 'Suckerbutt / PepperSchmuck combine' law suit.
Seriously - don't waste your effort on Carolina Ripper powder, IMHO you should be making more of your wonderful smoked Manzano powder !
Mr. Hill said:
IMO it's silly to expect perfection when were talking about breeding . Trait and genetic stability are one in the same, as if you don't have genetic stability you never can have trait stability as with out one you can never have the other. Breeding F matting Ie F1, F2, F3, is the worse way to ever try to get genetic stability of any of the ways to breed as you start with a cross F1 and no matter what you never have anything but a genetic cross.
Genetics will never be as easy as 1 + 1 = 2 as it's more like 80,000 x 80,000 = 640,000,000
If you breed dominate pod shape A with recessive pod shape b the F1 pod shape will be the dominant A (though genetically it will be Ab). The F2 will show 25% AA, 25% Ab, 25% bA, and 25% bb. So 1 in 4 plants should have the pod shape you are looking for.
Right but if the 1 in 4 pod you like still is not the right gene paring no matter how many generations you pic for it will still always be unstable.
+1stc3248 said:The thing is...I don't think their claim to the name will hold up if selling the pods or seeds produced unless they made you sign the contract before you purchased the seeds. Otherwise every farmer that grew anything would have to pay royalties to the originator. I don't see a judge backing that claim. It is reasonable that someone purchasing seeds is doing so to raise a crop...and what they do with it is up to them. You can't sell folks the seeds then once everyone is done with the initial big buy change the rules and try to claim you have any rights over the crop produced. I think its all a giant scare tactic to keep their money grab going. Turns my stomach...I am very tempted to sell every bit of powder I produce at 25 cents over the cost of shipping to force them to take me to court...
The only thing you can't do is use the phrase "Smokin' Ed's Carolina Reaper". That is the phrase that's trademarked. According to my reading of the trademark application, even using "Carolina Reaper" would be allowed. Hopefully someone with more legal acumen than me will chime in on this. I posted over in the other thread how to access the application on the US Trademark site. It's rather wordy, so I won't copy/paste here, but anyone who wants to read the application for themselves can click this link to find out how.Pepper-Guru said:There is no way anyone is getting sued for doing anything with these peppers.
Fair enough. I guess game on, then?3/5King said:TGPS- I started this thread to keep the community grow about growing and take the (more heated) debate elsewhere. I mean imagine if this thread kept going in the Grow thread .
Play ball!theghostpepperstore said:Fair enough. I guess game on, then?
The whole topic has become so expansive you could probably create a whole new forum dedicated to it.
I would bet he got the you can't sell them or you will be sued thing. I would also agree that if there was no agreement when you were sold the seeds you will have the right to do with them as you please they are yours once you purchased them with no agreement. Looks like it is a money game to me. Bad to see Eds name go down the drain but not looking good. He claims to have made the peppers for the cancer healing properties but looks like he may have gotten greedy along the way. I did buy 30 seeds 10 from Ed and 20 from pepper Joe who I like and was great to deal with. I have about 12 healthy plants out of those thirty seeds no ripe pods yet. Will be interesting to see how this turns out. If they are selling seeds that you can't sell the pods or make any thing with them to sell they will not be selling seeds to many folks for long that is for sure.So can anyone answer why bakers pepper burned hundreds of reaper plants ?!
I read the cut/paste in the Community CR Glog. Ed indeed stated that it is generally accepted that F8 and beyond is generally considered stable. While he may have implied it, I didn't see where he specifically stated that the HP22B is F8 or beyond. Is that something that is common knowledge or has it just been cleverly implied all along without actually stating the true generation?armac said:there is a long thread on facebook that included Ed and Duffy, the variation in the reaper was brought up several times and each time the question was never answered.
kind of like Obama, if you can ignore a situation long enough, people lose interst and move along....so for now, it will be ignored.
It is on the Facebook page chiligrower
In the Facebook thread Ed says anything after F8 is stable, I asked about the plants that are growing the bhut like peppers and the hab like peppers and the question was not addressed. So I said that stable has nothing to do with pods but only with age......they beat around the bush on that as well.
so it seems that stable has nothing to with producing the same general pod, just as long as you can claim it is 8 generations old.
So anything you buy, no matter how weird the pod, it IS stable due to generational age.....pod variation is irrelevant i guess
If the patent is on the name, then include a photo of the source pepper with the ad for the product for sale and call them "not-Primos."stc3248 said:The thing is...I don't think their claim to the name will hold up if selling the pods or seeds produced unless they made you sign the contract before you purchased the seeds. Otherwise every farmer that grew anything would have to pay royalties to the originator. I don't see a judge backing that claim. It is reasonable that someone purchasing seeds is doing so to raise a crop...and what they do with it is up to them. You can't sell folks the seeds then once everyone is done with the initial big buy change the rules and try to claim you have any rights over the crop produced. I think its all a giant scare tactic to keep their money grab going. Turns my stomach...I am very tempted to sell every bit of powder I produce at 25 cents over the cost of shipping to force them to take me to court...
oh...sorry. They're not stable, the end kindly disregard the above post...unless you wanna read it.
You are missing the big first step ...you need to have someone out there (who isn't the thread starter but someone who will be the first to post) spruiking the thread well before its started.... hyping it and hyping it and then hyping it some more3/5King said:Play ball!
Hahahaha this post made me crack up. Yup, there's about 5 different directions we can go but so far it's working out well...a dash of this, a pinch of that, a squeeze of this and now you have the perfect thread....IT'S NOT STABLE THOUGH GUYS.....we have to start this thread again and talk about the same stuff....like 8-9 times and then, it might stabilize.....or not..