solid7 said:I don't dispute that deep green isn't the whole truth, the same as huge leaves, huge stems, etc, etc.
That was a curiosity question. My own experience has shown me that if everything else is good, that deep green is icing on the cake.
lek said:did you use unbuffered coco or buffered coco?
fertilizer with NPK 3-4-5 for coco medium seem weird to me.
coco has a lot K. it will release a lot of K, Na over time. Why NPK 3-4-5?
Chilidude said:
It is unbuffered coco and better ask directly from Hesi, why your coco fertilizer have NPK of 3-4-5...
lek said:
LOL... i think it's not ideal for growing pepper plant.
Chilidude said:
Hesi coco have slighly more phosphorus that have a major role in root, flower and fruit development.
Chilidude said:LOL, it is made for growing that green stuff and who knows if the stuff is also good for growing chilis or not until it is tested, but for now it sure looks pretty promising to me.
hmmm... i dont think so. NPK 3-4-5(+coco medium) vs NPK 3-1-4.4 is a big difference. Pepper needs K > N > P.Chilidude said:Chilli focus fertilizer for example have the npk value of 3.0-1.0-4.4, the only major difference is that the Hesi coco have slighly more phosphorus that have a major role in root, flower and fruit development.
lek said:hmmm... i dont think so. NPK 3-4-5(+coco medium) vs NPK 3-1-4.4 is a big difference. Pepper needs K > N > P.
Chilidude said:It really doest matter to me what NPK value this particular fertilizer have, only one thing matters to me is, if you are satisfied of the results using it for growing chilis.
solid7 said:
No argument with that. But since you're testing, my point was, and is... See what happens when you compare with something else in a different NPK setup. You're shooting for a target EC, so make that work for you. Whatever you load up in one config, is either going to be efficient, or rob you, in the long run. (unless you just really love flushing out your media)
.
Sorry if this discussion has become laborious. My assumption was that you were doing this to really put the nutrient under the microscope, and try to become more scientific in your approach as a grower. There's a lot of fallacies out there, and new growers read the same stuff we do.
solid7 said:
Sorry, lek. You're not correct.
.
K < P < N
.
The theoretical optimum uptake ratio for plants - according to plant scientists, not me - is 3-1-2.
lek said:
sorry solid7, you're not correct.
this is pepper!!! it's a heavy fruiting plant.
P < N < K
with K < P < N, your result will be far from maximum yield.
Chilidude said:The whole point is that you could have the most perfect fertilizer ever created but it alone cant create miracles, as it all comes down to how good you are as a grower in the end.
The_NorthEast_ChileMan said:
The whole point is that you could have the most perfect fertilizer ever created but it alone cant create miracles, as it all comes down to how good you are as a grower in the end.
Chilidude said:To all of you fancy people regarding optimal/ideal NPK values for chili growing:
The whole point is that you could have the most perfect fertilizer ever created but it alone cant create miracles, as it all comes down to how good you are as a grower in the end.