Assuming this is an old thread somewhere, but cursory searches revealed nothing so I thought I'd bring it up here.
As a longtime chilehead, this news came as something of a surprise (albeit with an incredulous stare). That the Red Savina Habanero was the old title holder, tipping the scales at just over 500,000 SHU on (average) is common knowledge, and that most Red Savinas were comparatively stronger than their Orange cousins has been a pervading given. At least one study appears to challenge this, however.
I came across something on Wikipedia where one author mentions a study by Chile Pepper Institute at New Mexico State University done in 2005 where they measured the average heat of Red Savinas at 248,000 SHU, and found the average Scoville rating of Orange Habaneros at 357,000 SHU. The 'average' part made me pause, because that would mean they hadn't just stumbled across some random anomaly. All of their Red Savinas were consistently trounced by Orange Habs.
I personally never noticed a marked difference between the two, and I've eaten them both whole. I'm wondering if there's some truth to this, or if it's isolated to their available test varieties. I know that if a seasoned chile grower tried, they could probably find ways to weaken their Red Savinas, while optimizing their Orange Habs. I also know a lot of sloppy seed dealers grow their Red Savina plants next to mild cross-pollinators, with little effort to isolate, and sell offspring seeds labeled "Red Savina" all the time. Was there a polluted gene pool for tested cultivars? If so, I hope it isn't a trend.
The author cited Dave DeWitt's The Complete Chile Pepper Book. I actually own this book, and don't remember the section, and as the room where I keep my books looks like Brock Lesnar has been breakdancing in it at the moment, I couldn't find it to verify.
Any anecdotal experiences substantiate this?
-