I'm going to resurrect an idea that's been poo-poo'd before. It was something to the effect of take some non-winning entries and revisit them. The idea was poo-poo'd as a backhanded compliment, but I don't see it that way. I'm seeing it more like Iron Chef: Redemption. No one would say the chefs who didn't win on that show are mediocre - they're professionals, but what they came up with just didn't happen to beat the others the first time around. Did an entry of yours miss a crown by one vote? No shame in that. It was probably an excellent entry. If you step back and reflect on it, was it something you'd enter again, or is there something you'd do a tad differently that might have snagged more votes the first time around? Could be everyone make their own entries and see if they can take them up a notch (or even remake as-is without changes if it was uber-close), or people choose other's entries and decide if they want to tweak it or not. Ok, commence poo-pooing again!