What do you mean by "shortcuts." I suspect that you simply mean that not verifying the stability qualifies as a shortcut.
Yes, that's pretty much what I was referring to. The Reaper was cultivated from two superhots. Were they well established? Or did the seeds come from a relatively new superhot? Shortcuts.
All this drama is ridiculous. I agree that the strain my not be as stable as it could, but who cares? It's a new variety that we should be stoked to grow. And as far as the unexpected variations go, I think it's awesome. That's how new strains are made, isn't it? So grow them out, and maybe you can someday have your own strain.
And all this slamming of Joe and Ed is just plain stupid. These guys are reputable vendors, and overall stand up guys. You got something you didn't expect, get over it. It's not like Joe and Ed are trying to screw you, they are just trying to sell some seeds.
I'll agree that the drama is ridiculous. As to who cares every single person who has invested money, time, and effort into growing this pepper should care. People paid money for seeds to grow the Reaper pepper. Pictures were posted as to what it's supposed to look like. Obviously some difference in pods is acceptable. But the number of different shapes, sizes, and now a different color suggests there is no such animal as a stable Reaper pepper.
Joe and Ed may be stand up guys, I don't know either one personally. However, paying for one thing and getting another is not acceptable to most folks. I doubt if in the beginning of selling these seeds they were trying to screw people. But if a majority of people who paid for these seeds are getting the same amount of variety in the pods and they are continuing to sell these seeds as Reaper peppers then they are screwing people. When what you sell isn't what you're advertising then its a ripoff. How else would anyone describe it?