Unfair? I thought I was being honest..at least I asked him before I made my statement. I agree with what you said but supposedly I've used up my likes for the day. I have a tendency to be outspoken a bit but I try to stick to the truth. I am a skeptic! That's not a bad thing, it just means I'm reserving judgement. IF I ever grow a pepper that I think might be a record setter I'd sure want all my friends here and every other test possible to make sure it wasn't my imagination. I would want others to grow and test them under all possible conditions. Then IF it stood the tests maybe I would have something to crow about!
I agree to some extent, and others have echoed that consistency is key, but if you're in Jim's shoes, how can you possibly say with definition that he results are replicable? I can see why he answered the way he did. The real answer is, "I don't know". No one can guarantee that. And that's why I said it's unfair for him to make some sort of guarantee with variables he can't possibly be aware of. Being a skeptic on repeatable results seems fair, but even if they are repeatable, Jim would be amiss in guaranteeing results in anywhere but his own environment. I don't think there has been a pepper measured yet that has been tested "under all possible conditions". What does that mean?
Strange how with last years tests the bhut rarely reached 1 mil SHU and scorpions were tested much hotter. This year the bhuts averaged over 1 mil SHU and the Scorpion averages only slightly higher.
From personal consumtion I can guarantee that the bhuts/nagas I grow are not nearly as hot as the Trinidad Scorpion-BT that I've grown and most who have tried them both will agree
Yeah. My chocolate habs were considerably hotter, subjectively, than any bhuts I consumed last year from my own plants. Shrug. Just the way it goes.